Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić resigns amid anti‑corruption protests, prompting early parliamentary elections and international scrutiny of Serbia's political transition.

Serbian President Vučić Resigns, Early Elections Loom

Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić resigned Friday, setting in motion a constitutional timetable for early parliamentary elections.

The decision comes after a year of street demonstrations that accused the administration of corruption and demanded greater transparency. Protesters have gathered in Belgrade and other cities, calling for accountability from senior officials.

Vučić, who has led Serbia since 2017, announced his departure in a televised address. He said the move was intended to facilitate a smooth political transition and to give voters a chance to choose a new government.

Constitutional process

Under Serbia’s constitution, the president’s resignation triggers a mandatory call for elections within 45 days. The National Assembly must then approve the election date, and a new parliament will be seated after the vote.

Opposition response

Opposition leaders welcomed the resignation, describing it as an opportunity to reset the political landscape. They urged the ruling party to respect the electoral calendar and to allow a free campaign.

International reaction

European Union officials said they will monitor the upcoming elections closely, emphasizing the need for a credible and transparent process. They added that progress on reforms remains a priority for Serbia’s EU accession talks.

Analysts note that the early election could reshape the balance of power in the country. The ruling Serbian Progressive Party holds a parliamentary majority, but recent polls suggest growing public fatigue with the status quo.

Election officials have pledged to organize the vote in accordance with domestic law and international standards. Voter registration deadlines are expected to be announced within the next week.

As Serbia prepares for the snap election, the coming weeks will test the nation’s institutions and its ability to address the grievances that fueled the protests.